35 points, the indicator of permanence in 2019-20

first_imgTo get started, the 15 points that Celta scores become the lowest score of a seventeenth ranked, the one that fixes the permanence, in all the three-point leagues. The average points with the current conditions (Leagues of 38 days and with decrease of the last three), to get an idea, is in the 19. And Celta himself, who occupied last year the same position at this point, already had 21 points. This figure predicts that, unless historical milestone, this season will be a cheap stay.But how much can it be? If we stick to the points necessary to save in the previous Leagues, would stand at 39. However, it would be more reliable to calculate how many points have been needed to save between the first round and the second round. And there the result is 20 on average, a figure that in the last five years has dropped a lot. Therefore, in this case it would go from the current 15 to the final 35 as a figure for permanence. Journal As’); return false; “class =” item-multimedia “>As diary The mission will not be simple, but not impossible. How to climb a high mountain, It will be a huge, epic effort, not a miracle. This is how Espanyol will face the second round after finishing the first in some numbers that certainly clash with the story: no team that added 11 points on day 19 has been saved. So far the negative, which is not little. The rest of the statistics announce that, as Cornellà-El Prat sings, “yes, you can”.center_img And the Spanish? Well here goes another great statistical news. His average points in the second laps is 24. Sure enough, they are juThese would need to reach that magical amount of 35 that could guarantee you continue in First. It would be worth it, to get an idea, emulate what he has already achieved in 11 of the last 20 seasons, beginning with the last course with Joan Francesc Ferrer ‘Rubi’ (29) and also the previous two, with Quique Sánchez Flores and David Gallego (30 and 25, in chronological order).Obviously, these are only calculations based on historical value. The only sure reality today is that it is Espanyol forced to overcome his three immediate rivals. Specifically, to trace the three points he lost against Leganés and recover the four that take him away from Mallorca (which was five until Saturday) and Celta. And some more than sure will get into the fight …last_img read more

Read More

End of US shutdown wont mean return to business as usual for

first_img Once their doors are open, however, there will be a staggering amount of work waiting to be done. And that will require triage, says David Conover, vice president of research at the University of Oregon in Eugene and a former ocean division director at NSF.“The first thing they’ll probably want to do is address what didn’t happen during the shutdown,” he says. At NSF, a $7.6 billion agency with no in-house research operations, that will mean processing routine award transactions that were frozen, resuming conversations with scientists with questions about both current awards as well as upcoming competitions, and rescheduling more than 100 review panels—involving 2000 proposals—that were scrubbed during the shutdown.At other agencies, early tasks could include reopening shuttered websites that provide publicly available data and restarting research projects that paused midstream.Taking such immediate steps should ease some of the anxiety that has built up in the scientific community about the status of their research. The uncertainty was especially painful for those with time-sensitive studies that had been approved by funding agencies, but for which the money had not been made available. Also breathing easier: graduate students and postdocs waiting to be put on federally funded grants awarded to their mentors.But what Conover calls “clearing the decks” is only the first—and in many ways the easiest—step. “What’s going to be more challenging is looking ahead to all the pending actions,” he says. At NSF’s headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, that list includes making decisions on new awards, scheduling panel meetings to review the next tranche of proposals, and fleshing out plans for new initiatives. All that stopped during the shutdown, he emphasizes, and it can’t simply be turned back on along with the lights.“Nobody has looked at any of that stuff,” he says about the pileup of electronic submissions and other communications with the agency. “And NSF may want to wait a while to see what happens in Congress before they think about rescheduling everything, because they could be shut down again.”To avoid that second shutdown, Congress and Trump must strike a deal on the president’s demand for $5.7 billion for a border wall. That issue triggered the current shutdown, and the Democrats now in control of the U.S. House of Representatives have so far refused to negotiate until shuttered agencies were given funding to continue normal operations. If no deal is reached by 15 February, those agencies will once again run out of money.Nusser hopes NSF and other agencies put “people first” as they resume grantmaking operations. But that will still leave a lot of unfinished business.“I don’t know if we should expect to see very much happen in the next 3 weeks,” she says. Federal employees, she notes, “have been through a pretty difficult situation, and I can imagine they are pretty demoralized.”Research and university groups reacted to today’s developments with guarded optimism. “We are pleased that the White House and Congress reached an agreement to reopen federal agencies and urge all parties to ensure we won’t be right back in this same situation in three weeks,” said Peter McPherson, president of the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) in Washington, D.C., in a statement. “Although three weeks of funding is better than no funding at all, the U.S. research enterprise does not operate anywhere close to full strength when agencies are only guaranteed to be open three weeks at a time.”APLU also urged legislators to pass spending bills that would provide previously proposed increases for research agencies, rather than freeze their 2019 budgets at 2018 levels. Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe End of U.S. shutdown won’t mean return to business as usual for research agencies By Jeffrey MervisJan. 25, 2019 , 5:20 PM The longest U.S. government shutdown in history may soon be over, at least temporarily. But researchers shouldn’t expect their favorite federal research agency to be back to normal anytime soon.“Scientists will need to be patient,” warns Sarah Nusser, vice president for research at Iowa State University in Ames. “You’re not going to get all your questions answered immediately.”President Donald Trump’s announcement this afternoon that he would accept a 3-week extension of current funding levels for several departments and agencies will allow them to reopen on Monday, and Congress appears ready to act at once. The agencies that conduct or fund research that have been mostly closed since 22 December 2018 include NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Emailcenter_img Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country AFGE/Flickr (CC BY 2.0) Furloughed federal workers who protested the shutdown earlier this month in Washington, D.C., will be going back to work, for at least 3 weeks.last_img read more

Read More